PDA

View Full Version : Tool Shows Promise in Identifying Infants With Autism


Prot
05-12-2009, 06:46 PM
Researchers have come up with a relatively simple tool that could be the answer to many clinicians' wish for a practical screen for autism in very young children. Called the Systematic Observation of Red Flags (SORF), the instrument distinguishes between 18- to 24-month-olds with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and those with either developmental delays or who are healthy, normal children.

A study presented here at the 8th Annual International Meeting for Autism Research indicates that children who have at least eight of the 20 "red flags" in SORF have a high probability of having autism.

In 2007, members of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Council on Children With Disabilities called for pediatricians to systematically screen all infants for ASDs at 18 and 24 months of age (Johnson CP et al. Pediatrics. 2007;120:1183-1215).

However, there were no reliable physician-administered tools for ASD screening of the general infant population; the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) and the Infant-Toddler Checklist (ITC) are usually relied upon for first-line, parent-reported screening. The SORF could help fill that gap, notes Geri Dawson, PhD, chief scientific officer for Autism Speaks.


http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/702626

roadracer
05-13-2009, 12:31 AM
Not a member of the site, so I cant read the whole thing, but from what you posted, the last two words explain it all "Austism Speaks". when something is funded by them it leads me to question it, because of there history
Although that study might not be bad, autism speaks makes me so freaking mad, I wish they would learn a thing or two about autism.

Aspigander
05-13-2009, 11:51 AM
Roadracer, can you explain what the problem is with autism speaks? I've read online that a lot of folks have a beef with them, but can you explain what that beef is? I'm not saying A.S. is good or bad here, as I don't know that much about the organization, but just wondering where it is that they go wrong.

roadracer
05-13-2009, 06:44 PM
Sorry if I said something wrong mrsjerome
Aspigander, I think it is probably best if I didnt say anything else about it

mrsjerome
05-13-2009, 10:22 PM
[QUOTE=roadracer;347916]Sorry if I said something wrong mrsjerome

Roadracer
How could you have said something wrong if I didn't post on this thread.
So I don't know what you would be apologizing to me for ?????

roadracer
05-14-2009, 12:35 AM
[QUOTE=roadracer;347916]Sorry if I said something wrong mrsjerome

Roadracer
How could you have said something wrong if I didn't post on this thread.
So I don't know what you would be apologizing to me for ?????

okay, never mind then, I seen how my post might be taken as offensive, and then I seen deleted post and I came to that conclusion. Sometimes I get afraid that I messed up again here, I am good at that :o.