Nat Hyland
07-27-2008, 12:15 AM
Hi all
For all of our subjects last semester there was a component of group work. I think the university believes it is the best way to encourage and promote teamwork after we are employed. Well, I disagree, because not everyone has the same degree of commitment to the cause.
For two of my subjects I was in the same group of girls. One of the girls I knew fairly well and is a friend, the other two I didn't know so well, although one works where I used to work (as a carer). For one subject, the other two girls (apart from my friend Eunice) contributed NOTHING - and I mean NOTHING, and Eunice and I did all the work. Of course, the other two girls received a mark for the work.
When it came to submitting work for the other subject, and the other two girls STILL hadn't contributed anything (or not much more than the last subject) Eunice complained to me about us putting down their signatures as having contributed to the work, when really they hadn't. I told her that we should tell the lecturer, as we should have with the other subject, but Eunice wouldn't do it. Unfortunately she didn't say this until AFTER we had submitted the major part of the work (a portfolio of information, including an essay, on bipolar disorder)
So we went to the lecturer, and she asked Eunice and I to sign a declaration stating that we had done the work without contribution from the other two girls. We did this, and then the lecturer called us all into her office to discuss what we would do. She had said that the portfolio would have got 75% anyway, but could get more if we put a couple of other things in and fixed a couple of things up. It was decided that one of the other girls (Janine) would be responsible for adding the extra work, fixing the parts that had to be fixed, and then submitting the assingment. This was because she had contributed nothing so far.
We left it at that, and Janine was given a week to resubmit the assignment. The way we submit assignments is in "pidgeon-holes" which are boxes in the main building which are clearly labelled with the subject, code and lecturer for the subject. A couple of days after Janine was due to submit the assignment I sent her a text message and asked her if she had submitted it. She said yes, that everything was fine. So I thought nothing more of it until I still hadn't received a mark by the next week. Then last Monday I received two text messages - one from Eunice, and one from the other girl Ivy, asking how I went in the subject. I was at work when the text went through, so I didn't have a chance to look at the internet until the next day to see what the mark was. When I looked, I had an "L" next to that subject, meaning the mark was late. When I phoned the other girl (Ivy) that night and told her she said "Oh yeah, Janine told me that when she went to submit the assignment she accidentally put it in the wrong pidgeon-hole for a different subject"! Well, that made my blood boil, because the mark was already late, and I didn't know how long it would take for the assignment to be found and given to the right person (the uni was on holidays at the time).
Eunice phoned me very upset yesterday and said that she had only received 53% for the subject, and wanted to know what I had received. She said that by that mark, we must have only received 8% for the portfolio (as I said it was worth 40% of the overall mark). When I looked I found that I had only received 51%, and I soon realised what had happened. I told Eunice that I thought the portfolio hadn't yet been found, and because the marks had to be submitted by Friday, our marks had NOT included the portfolio, because it HADN'T BEEN FOUND! There is NO WAY we would have received only 8%, because we had already been told that we would have received 75% for the portfolio in its ORIGINAL state. Taking that into account, when the assignment is found, it should add another 30% (at least) to our overall mark, bringing it to 80-something per cent. Whether they will actually ALLOW our marks to be changed to include the portfolio is another matter.
We had considered compling the whole portfolio again, because we still had copies of everything, but it would have taken too long. So Eunice and I will be speaking to the lecturer tomorrow to see what we can do about the portfolio.
The stuff up with the portfolio just enforced my dislike of doing group work :(!
Nat.
For all of our subjects last semester there was a component of group work. I think the university believes it is the best way to encourage and promote teamwork after we are employed. Well, I disagree, because not everyone has the same degree of commitment to the cause.
For two of my subjects I was in the same group of girls. One of the girls I knew fairly well and is a friend, the other two I didn't know so well, although one works where I used to work (as a carer). For one subject, the other two girls (apart from my friend Eunice) contributed NOTHING - and I mean NOTHING, and Eunice and I did all the work. Of course, the other two girls received a mark for the work.
When it came to submitting work for the other subject, and the other two girls STILL hadn't contributed anything (or not much more than the last subject) Eunice complained to me about us putting down their signatures as having contributed to the work, when really they hadn't. I told her that we should tell the lecturer, as we should have with the other subject, but Eunice wouldn't do it. Unfortunately she didn't say this until AFTER we had submitted the major part of the work (a portfolio of information, including an essay, on bipolar disorder)
So we went to the lecturer, and she asked Eunice and I to sign a declaration stating that we had done the work without contribution from the other two girls. We did this, and then the lecturer called us all into her office to discuss what we would do. She had said that the portfolio would have got 75% anyway, but could get more if we put a couple of other things in and fixed a couple of things up. It was decided that one of the other girls (Janine) would be responsible for adding the extra work, fixing the parts that had to be fixed, and then submitting the assingment. This was because she had contributed nothing so far.
We left it at that, and Janine was given a week to resubmit the assignment. The way we submit assignments is in "pidgeon-holes" which are boxes in the main building which are clearly labelled with the subject, code and lecturer for the subject. A couple of days after Janine was due to submit the assignment I sent her a text message and asked her if she had submitted it. She said yes, that everything was fine. So I thought nothing more of it until I still hadn't received a mark by the next week. Then last Monday I received two text messages - one from Eunice, and one from the other girl Ivy, asking how I went in the subject. I was at work when the text went through, so I didn't have a chance to look at the internet until the next day to see what the mark was. When I looked, I had an "L" next to that subject, meaning the mark was late. When I phoned the other girl (Ivy) that night and told her she said "Oh yeah, Janine told me that when she went to submit the assignment she accidentally put it in the wrong pidgeon-hole for a different subject"! Well, that made my blood boil, because the mark was already late, and I didn't know how long it would take for the assignment to be found and given to the right person (the uni was on holidays at the time).
Eunice phoned me very upset yesterday and said that she had only received 53% for the subject, and wanted to know what I had received. She said that by that mark, we must have only received 8% for the portfolio (as I said it was worth 40% of the overall mark). When I looked I found that I had only received 51%, and I soon realised what had happened. I told Eunice that I thought the portfolio hadn't yet been found, and because the marks had to be submitted by Friday, our marks had NOT included the portfolio, because it HADN'T BEEN FOUND! There is NO WAY we would have received only 8%, because we had already been told that we would have received 75% for the portfolio in its ORIGINAL state. Taking that into account, when the assignment is found, it should add another 30% (at least) to our overall mark, bringing it to 80-something per cent. Whether they will actually ALLOW our marks to be changed to include the portfolio is another matter.
We had considered compling the whole portfolio again, because we still had copies of everything, but it would have taken too long. So Eunice and I will be speaking to the lecturer tomorrow to see what we can do about the portfolio.
The stuff up with the portfolio just enforced my dislike of doing group work :(!
Nat.